Skip to main content

Was Sandy Hook a Hoax? Part 9: The Search Warrant

Hours from now, authorities in Connecticut are planning to release the list of items seized from Adam Lanza's car and home, as well as other information about the Sandy Hook incident.  Unfortunately, this information will be released with its share of edits, deletions, and possible cover-ups.  Withholding information from a highly-concerned public seems par for the course, however- at least when it comes to State's Attorney Stephen Sedensky and police spokesperson Lt. Vance.

The New Haven Register reports that an unnamed Danbury Superior Court judge has redacted some of the material- including multiple paragraphs- in order to protect a witness.  In legal terms, this means that the report has been sliced and diced, white-washed, and edited.

Other media outlets, including the Housatonic Times, confirm these unsettling developments in the Newtown saga.  John Christofferson of the Associated Press writes:

State's Attorney Stephen Sedensky III asked a judge not to release the name of a witness, saying the person's safety may be jeopardized if the name were disclosed. He also asked that other information be redacted, such as telephone numbers and a few paragraphs of an affidavit.

To anyone following the Sandy Hook saga, this should draw a red flag faster than a ten-car pileup at a Nascar race.  

First, let's discuss this unnamed "witness".  If Adam Lanza acted alone, as the authorities claim, why exactly would this person's safety be in jeopardy?  Is Adam Lanza going to come back from the dead and exact revenge?  Who is this witness, and who is this person hiding from?

Naturally, the authorities have the right to withhold some information, such as addresses and phone numbers, but intentionally deleting whole paragraphs does very little to dispel notions that the Sandy Hook investigation was botched like a heart surgery performed by a caffeine-riddled monkey with advanced Parkinson's disease.

The New Haven Register stated that the official records have been redacted so that serial numbers from some of the property seized will be unavailable to the public.  This also raises some red flags.  If the weapons used at Sandy Hook had been purchased by Nancy Lanza, as we have been told, this statement could be verified by the media if the police released the serial numbers.  On the other hand, covering up this information seems to open the door to the possibility that the weapons fell into Lanza's hands by some other means.  

Think about it.  If the story we had been given was true, the serial numbers would corroborate the claims made by the authorities and put to rest many of the conspiracy rumors.  Failure to provide this information is disturbing enough in itself, but the fact that Stephen Sedensky and a Superior Court judge went out of their way to erase this information from the record before presenting it to the public is shameful, disgraceful, and reeks of a cover up.

Once again, the powers-that-be in the state of Connecticut have shown utter disrespect and blatant arrogance toward the American public which longs for reliable, truthful, and accurate information.  It is a slap in the face to every parent with school-aged children who fear for their child's safety, and it is a kick in the teeth to every concerned citizen of the United States who has been denied information week after week and month after month.

But most importantly, the actions of Mr. Sedensky, the Superior Court judge, and Lt. Vance have made a mockery of the judicial system and the law enforcement process; by intentionally white-washing the official narrative of what took place on December 14, these individuals only focus the bright white spotlight of suspicion on themselves.  On several occasions, Lt. Vance had the audacity to express his anger toward "conspiracy theorists" (or anyone who questioned his version of the incident).  Well, the veiled secrecy surrounding Sandy Hook- coupled with "redacted" facts and deleted paragraphs- is only going to add fuel to the conspiracy fire.

Popular posts from this blog

The Incest Capital of the World?

At the far eastern edge of Kentucky, nestled in Appalachia, resides Letcher County. In spite of its isolation and poverty (approximately 30% of the county's population lives below the poverty line), Letcher County has managed to grow at an impressive rate, from a population of just 9,172 in 1900 to a present-day population of nearly 25,000. However, even if Letcher County tripled or quadrupled its present population, there's still a pretty good chance that virtually all of the county's inhabitants would be related to each other-- thanks to one particularly fertile family whose astounding rate of reproduction can put even the friskiest rabbit to shame.

Around the year 1900, Letcher County was the home of a man by the name of Jason L. Webb, who made national headlines for having the one of the largest families in the world. According to newspaper reports of the era, Jason had 19 children, 175 grandchildren, and 100 great-grandchildren. Perhaps even more impressive was his b…

The Ticking Tombstone of Landenberg

If you look closely at a map of Pennsylvania, you'll see an anomalous semi-circular border at the extreme southeastern part of the state. This circle, known officially as the "Twelve Mile Circle", serves as the border between the Keystone State and Delaware. Much of the strange circle is surrounded by Chester County, one of the three original Pennsylvania counties created by William Penn in 1682. While there are many historical points of interest in Chester County, few are strange or as steeped in legend as the Ticking Tombstone.

Near the London Tract Meeting House in Landenberg is an old graveyard which contains a tombstone which is said to make eerie ticking noises, much like the ticking of a pocketwatch. Landenberg locals claim that the ticking is the result of two very famous surveyors who arrived in town during the 1760s- Charles Mason and Jeremiah Dixon.  A young child supposedly swallowed a valuable pocketwatch owned by Mason and later died, and the boy's head…

Jenny Hanivers, Mermaids, Devil Fish, and Sea Monks

Three centuries before P.T. Barnum attracted flocks of crowds with his mummified Fiji Mermaid (which turned out to be a papier-mâché creation featuring a monkey's head and a fish's body), sailors around the world had already began manufacturing "mermaids".  Known as Jenny Hanivers, these creations were often sold to tourists and provided sailors with an additional source of income.  These mummified creatures were produced by drying, carving, and then varnishing the carcasses of fish belonging to the order rajiformes- a group of flattened cartilaginous fish related to the shark which includes stingrays and skates.  These preserved carcasses can be made to resemble mermaids, dragons, angels, demons, and other mythical creatures.

Jenny Hanivers became popular in the mid-16th century, when sailors around the Antwerp docks began selling the novelties to tourists.  This practice was so common  in the Belgian city that it may have influenced the name; it is widely believed …